Prediction of Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Vadim Alekseenko Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ugo Carabelli vs V. Alekseenko

Camilo Ugo Carabelli

ARG

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

497

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$595.1K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Vadim Alekseenko

UKR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

497

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$595.1K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Carabelli 1 - 0 Alekseenko

They have played 2 sets in total, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli winning 2 and Vadim Alekseenko winning 0. The last match between Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Vadim Alekseenko was at the Turkey F27, 05-07-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Carabelli	1
Alekseenko	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Turkey F27(07-05-16)

Stats

Camilo Ugo Carabelli

Vadim Alekseenko

C. U. Carabelli vs V. Alekseenko H2H Profile

C. U. Carabelli	Stats	V. Alekseenko
$595,100	Career Prize Money	$0
62.64% (379-226)	Career Total W/L	47.17% (250-280)
1	Hard	0
12	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
45.00% (18-22)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. U. Carabelli vs V. Alekseenko Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Camilo Ugo Carabelli has won 46.21% of points on their second serve, while Vadim Alekseenko has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Camilo Ugo Carabelli, in recent form, has won 45.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vadim Alekseenko has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.37% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Camilo Ugo Carabelli has saved 59.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vadim Alekseenko has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Camilo Ugo Carabelli has won 60.00% of matches played (W/L 45/30), with Vadim Alekseenko winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Camilo Ugo Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 341/184), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/5). Vadim Alekseenko has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 177/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/3).
Player level: In the last year, Camilo Ugo Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 79.31% of matches (W/L 23/6), where as Vadim Alekseenko has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Camilo Ugo Carabelli winning 1 times and Vadim Alekseenko being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli winning 2 and Vadim Alekseenko winning 0.
The last match between Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Vadim Alekseenko was at the Turkey F27, 05-07-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Camilo Ugo Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 149.12 while Vadim Alekseenko has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Camilo Ugo Carabelli has won 76% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vadim Alekseenko has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Camilo Ugo Carabelli has converted 28.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vadim Alekseenko has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Vadim Alekseenko Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. U. Carabelli vs V. Alekseenko H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. U. Carabelli	Stats	V. Alekseenko
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	7
2	Aces (Total)	0
3	Total Double Faults	4
2:0:0	Average Match Time	2:0:0
49% (28/57)	1st Serve %	57% (34/60)
75% (21/28)	1st Serve Win %	47% (16/34)
55% (16/29)	2nd Serve Win %	35% (9/26)
75% (6/8)	Break Pts Won %	60% (3/5)
58% (35/60)	Return Points Win %	35% (20/57)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. U. Carabelli Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai - 29-09-2025
R2 Alex De MinaurA. De	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
R1 Terence AtmaneT. Atmane	W	4-4 ret.	Stats
China Open - Beijing - 22-09-2025
R1 Alejandro Davidovich FokinaA. Davidovich	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou - 15-09-2025
R1 Rinky HijikataR. Hijikata	L	7-6(2) 6-4	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 25-08-2025
R1 Tomas Martin EtcheverryT. Martin	L	6-3 6-2 6-0	Stats

View All

V. Alekseenko Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Turkey F31 (Antalya) - 08-10-2018
Q1 Aleksandar TomasA. Tomas	L	w/o	Stats
Turkey F30 (Antalya) - 01-10-2018
R1 Lucas HellfritschL. Hellfritsch	L	6-4 3-6 6-2	Stats
Turkey F29 (Antalya) - 24-09-2018
Q2 Lorenzo BrescianiL. Bresciani	L	6-2 7-6(6)	Stats
Turkey F28 (Antalya) - 17-09-2018
R2 Paul WoernerP. Woerner	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
R1 Gokberk ErgenemanG. Ergeneman	W	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

C. U. Carabelli vs V. Alekseenko Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. U. Carabelli	Stats	V. Alekseenko
62.64% (379/226)	YTD Win/Loss	47.17% (250/280)
59.37% (830/568)	Sets Win/Loss	46.61% (556/637)
53.64% (6938/5996)	Games Win/Loss	49.08% (5221/5417)
50.68% (37/36)	Hard Win/Loss	43.94% (58/74)
64.95% (341/184)	Clay Win/Loss	49.44% (177/181)
50.00% (1/1)	Indoor Hard W/L	38.89% (14/22)
0.00% (0/5)	Grass Win/Loss	25.00% (1/3)
0.18	Aces Per Game	0.02
1132	Aces Total	129
0.21	Double Faults Per Game	0.1
1348	Total Double Faults	495
1:41:24	Average Match Time	1st Match
371.5	Average Opponent Rank	528.4
62% (24329/39309)	1st Serve %	68% (6909/10089)
66% (16131/24329)	1st Serve Win %	57% (3947/6909)
50% (7421/14979)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (1378/3177)
45% (2052/4559)	Break Points Won % (Total)	46% (459/998)
43% (17034/39842)	Return Points Win %	41% (4079/9903)
36.36% (8/14)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
40.91% (9/13)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
49.06% (26/27)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/5)
65.52% (190/100)	Challenger W/L	28.57% (4/10)
66.97% (146/72)	Futures W/L	48.14% (246/265)
63% (367/579)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	47% (246/523)
44% (7/16)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
53% (82/154)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	37% (37/100)
60% (109/182)	Deciding Set Win %	57% (80/140)
89% (348/310)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (241/207)
10% (348/35)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (241/33)
26% (256/67)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	15% (289/42)